|
Online stores by location:
UNITED STATES |
| 
| 
Reality, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Buddha, and the absolute
New questions are often better than the answers to old ones.
Reality lies in the effect of the loss, or gain, of the fallible.
The sufferer begs for unity. Happiness cannot beg and therefore dies alone. Suffering must not be escaped, only understood. (ie. suffering often leads to unity)
Relation is personified experience.
Unity has been attained by personifying the 'other' and unpersonifying the 'self'.
Nietzsche was misunderstood as an existentialist, as was Kierkegaard. No existentialist would conceive of the 'Overman', as did Nietzsche, nor call himself a 'knight of faith' as did Kierkegaard.
We sit in illusion fields of our own sowing and reap desperate crops of emotional sustenance.
At times we are the politicians of souls who wouldn't vote for us even though they be our own.
How fortunate Buddha, Mohammed, or Shakespeare were in not being treated by kind-hearted relatives for their wild ecstasy and inspirations.
'God' is a verb.
When did 'all one' become 'alone'?
An action can be both noble and ignoble, and is justified by the reason for it.
The absolute is called formless, but what is content without form?
The absolute- an evolutionary product?
These fragments on Reality, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Buddha, and the absolute are taken from the unpublished writings of Jack Haas, from the notebooks 1990-2005.
To find out about books by Jack Haas, click on the image:
