|
|
|
|
Meaningful existence, dogma, heaven, pride, God, and predestination
A glass of wine has no meaningful existence until it is destroyed by that which created it. (ie. It would not exist except as a stage towards its final destination, its destruction)
Can children learn from the fantastic metaphors they dream?
The confused sinner need not be punished, for confusion is its own punishment.
Immoral acts 'snowball' by necessity.
Dogma estranges.
Heaven is not a serious place. It is light.
Man's intended end is in the effect of extended leisure.
The absolute cannot be thought of, only felt.
In the hierarchy of imagination, the idea of the all would be king.
The eyes of the separated self see nothing clearly.
Indifference lies between fear and desire.
If one 'knows' that if they died to day their life would be futile, they also know hell.
Pride in creative thought: theorists and poets battle this last foothold of the divided self.
I imagine God as symbiotic and childlike (innocent)
The idea of predestination effects the will as much as predestination itself.
Acceptance transcends the self, the self as will.
These fragments are taken from the unpublished writings of Jack Haas, from the notebooks 1990-2005. To find out about books by Jack Haas, click on the image:
|
|
|
|